What is the difference between resilience and recovery

Among the actions that may make a difference are the identification and training of community leaders; the development of recovery networks; the use of leaders and their networks to promote individual and organizational preparedness; and generally speaking, increasing individual preparedness with such efforts as enhanced community-based CPR classes.

NCDP is conducting research and pilot projects in all of these areas. Because disasters accelerate the stressors that are usually experienced by a community, they give us a clear window through which to observe resiliency and its twin, vulnerability.

NCDP sees a link between its mission in disaster preparedness and its commitment to protect the wellbeing of children, the disabled, the frail elderly, and others who are often left behind in disaster planning.

Much of NCDP research on community resilience focuses on vulnerable populations, and how we can develop the resources that will support them in a disaster, by increasing their access to healthcare, social services, education and other resources. Back to the Research Portal. Getting back online can be a largely manual process that requires a high level of human orchestration.

Disaster recovery has long been the way most banks deal with major system outages. However, recently, there has been a significant shift towards focusing on resilience rather than recovery.

The IT resilience approach focuses on protecting core services and preventing issues before they occur. This can involve identifying the risks and vulnerabilities associated with the services that support critical business processes and performing detailed risk assessments of the impact of an outage. Measures are then implemented to remove these risks. The shift towards resilience over disaster recovery has evolved mainly as a result of changes in peoples demands.

Workers want the ability to work remotely, flexibly and have access to the systems they need when they need them — and this has been made even more crucial as a result of Covid Relying on a proactive IT resilience approach certainly seems like a sensible method not only to protect your organisations IT assets but to provide the secure, always-on access, people and workers have come to expect and need during a crisis such as Covid Consumers expect uninterrupted access to these services at any time.

An increase in digital customer demands has led to a rise in the number of changes required for systems to meet those demands and maintain acceptable levels of service. Organisations need to ensure automated test, and release processes for these changes remain robust and uninterrupted. These levels underpin the provision of robust resilience and recovery tools and processes. Knowing your IT system, its weaknesses and both the resilience and recovery requirements are essential for understanding how to make your system truly resilient.

Resilience processes need continuously reviewed so they can be improved and updated to increase resilience over time. Your system may be awaiting updates, resulting in security lapses, you may be migrating on-premises technology to the cloud creating disruptions, or you may have increasing demands on your system due to the launch of a new product.

Monitoring your system and collecting data with an IT resilience approach helps to continuously assess possible weaknesses, allowing you to make changes and become as resilient as possible. With IT resilience designed to be proactive and create actionable plans should a disaster happen, having an effective IT resilience plan is crucial to the survival of an organisation.

If you would like to understand more about your options for enabling robust IT resilience, read our Azure disaster recovery guide , and discover how you can help your organisation to act and react to unforeseen IT events.